Dan Price (thwack) wrote,
Dan Price

Wouldn't you like to have a journal, too?

As I was paying for my groceries at Wegmans just now, the girl running the check-out line commented on my LiveJournal t-shirt. She said she had a journal here. :) We should've exchanged usernames. Oh well. Her nametag said Shirly... or Shirley, but I don't remember the e.

Just saw LotR:TTT for the first time. Yes, yes, it took me this long. Can you ever forgive me? Well anyway, it was pretty cool. I liked Legolas's method of mounting a charging horse. Very nice. :) One thing that stuck out to me was how similar Gollum looks, acts and speaks, to Harry Potter's house elf Dobby. I'm not saying either one copied the other and I don't care. The characters are quite different as written in the books, I'm sure. But I think the character designers for the movies could have tried a little harder to not make one remind people of the other. If they didn't give it any thought in that respect, they should have.

And I know Gollum was in the first LotR movie long before Dobby was in the second Harry Potter movie (at least in terms of release to us... I dunno about the design process) ... but Gollum didn't seem so similar to Dobby in the first film. Only in the second one does he change from a mysterious creepy cave-crawling thing to a bashful wimpy nuisance like Dobby.

I noticed that on some close-ups of Gollum they were shaking the camera just to show that they could. :-P They need to learn to shoot digital characters as if they're real people. How would they shoot the scene if Gollum was played by a real actor who looks like that? That's how they should shoot it for a digital character. But nevertheless, Gollum is the best (technically) digital character in a live action film to date.
  • Post a new comment


    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.